HIPAA Compliance for Medical Practices
68.8K views | +1 today
Follow
HIPAA Compliance for Medical Practices
HIPAA Compliance and HIPAA Risk management Articles, Tips and Updates for Medical Practices and Physicians
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!

Are You Feeling Confident About Your HIPAA Compliance? 

Are You Feeling Confident About Your HIPAA Compliance?  | HIPAA Compliance for Medical Practices | Scoop.it

A friendly reminder that, with the recent HHS Office of Civil Rights announcement, covered entities may soon be facing some unwelcome audits. Now’s the time to review compliance.

 

HIPAA compliance can sometimes feel like changing the oil in your car: inarguably necessary, a serious problem when left unchecked, yet tedious enough that some are willing to let the task slide. The difference, of course, is that one is bad for your engine while the other is a federally mandated and legally enforceable standard.

Friendly reminder: the HHS Office of Civil Rights (OCR) recently announced the Phase II launch of its HIPAA audit program, part of the 2009 HITECH Act. And with their finalized Audit Protocol published on April 8th, all signs point to the OCR soon getting down to brass tacks.

 

This needn’t be cause for alarm. But if covered entities or their business associates haven’t recently ensured that their compliance is watertight — especially regarding the measurement of referral and appointment activity — there’s definitely no time like the present.

There’s No Reason for Panic — Just Preparation

Audits are tentatively set to begin sometime in May, according to OCR official Devin McGraw via Politico, at which point randomly selected covered entities will receive an email announcing their fates (they recommend checking spam folders).

Business associates, who are also subject to individual audits, will be subject to audits in June or July. The agency plans to conduct roughly 200 remote desk audits, to be completed by December 2016, and anywhere from 10-25 “full scale” field audits thereafter, according to Healthcare Info Security. If you’re uncomfortable with the vagueness of this plan, you’re not alone.

The good news is that the majority of organizations will not be audited. However, if selected, entities will have a mere ten business days to prepare and submit all relevant documents via a secure online portal. Desk audits may (or may not) entail just a review of policies, or pertain to only one of the three HIPAA Rules: Privacy, Security, or Breach Notification. However, certain charmed organizations may, in fact, get to experience the unique joy of both desk and on-site audits.

Possibility for Consequences?

Officially, Phase II OCR audits are relatively benign, designed to “develop tools and guidance to assist the industry in compliance self-evaluation and in preventing breaches.” Nevertheless, they will open a formal investigation, should they find a “serious compliance issue,” however defined. And while OCR won’t publish the audit results (or even list which companies are audited), the whole process is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which means that journalists or other public agents can legally publish results. 

 

You may recall that 115 covered entities were audited in 2011 during Phase 1 of program, unearthing major compliance breaches; 89% were found to have compliance issues, and smaller organizations tended to struggle in multiple areas. 

Given the involvement of business associates — many of whom are not primarily dedicated to healthcare — one of the most difficult compliance aspects to cover will be Protected Health Information (PHI) and ePHI (electronic PHI). For instance, if your marketing agency measures referral and appointment activity, they’re likely in the domain of PHI and will need to be in solid compliance.

 

The bottom line is that if you haven’t implemented HIPAA privacy and security policies and procedures, recently conducted an inventory of relevant assets, or regularly completed risk assessments, then now is probably your last chance to do so before the audit process begins.

 

In the end, however, integrating a comprehensive HIPAA compliance program will keep you from running afoul of any regulatory standards that may come down the pipeline. The HHS is only conducting these audits in order to better enforce compliance standards in the future. So while you may or may not be audited this year, you and your digital marketing vendors must be prepared to stand up to scrutiny at any time.

Technical Dr. Inc.'s insight:
Contact Details :

inquiry@technicaldr.com or 877-910-0004
www.technicaldr.com

more...
No comment yet.
Scoop.it!

HIPAA Holiday Cheer

HIPAA Holiday Cheer | HIPAA Compliance for Medical Practices | Scoop.it

On the twelfth day of breaches
my hacker sent to me:

Twelve Data Downloads

Eleven Plundered Patches

Ten Missed BA Contracts

Nine Malware Installs

Eight Mis-sent Faxes

Seven Stolen Laptops

Six Snooping Staffers

Five Old NPPs

Four Lost Thumbdrives

Three Re-sent Texts

Two Pop-up Links …

And a Bill for Compliance Auditing.


Happy Holidays to All!



more...
No comment yet.
Scoop.it!

HIPAA Audits Are Still on Hold

HIPAA Audits Are Still on Hold | HIPAA Compliance for Medical Practices | Scoop.it

`The unit of the Department of Health and Human Services that enforces HIPAA still has plenty of work to do before it can launch its long-promised next round of HIPAA compliance audits, as planned for this year.

The HHS Office for Civil Rights has yet to develop a revised protocol for conducting the audits, OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels revealed during a Jan. 13 media briefing.


Samuels declined to offer a timeline for when OCR plans to resume its HIPAA audits, which Samuels says will include covered entities as well as business associates, who are now directly liable for HIPAA compliance under the HIPAA Omnibus Rule.

Early in 2014, OCR officials said the agency expected to resume compliance audits of covered entities in the fall of 2014, later expanding the program to include audits of business associates based on those vendors identified by covered entities in pre-audit surveys.

Then in September, OCR officials said the audit launch was stalled because of a delay in the rollout of technology to collect audit-related documents from covered entities and business associates.

In her comments Jan. 13, Samuels did not offer an explanation for the prolonged delay in resumption of HIPAA audits.

"OCR is committed to implementing an effective audit program, and audits will be an important compliance tool for OCR," Samuels said. The audits "will enable OCR to identify best practices and proactively uncover risks and vulnerabilities, like our other enforcement tools, such as complaints and compliance reviews; provide a proactive and systematic means to assess and improve industry compliance; enhance industry awareness of compliance obligations; and enable OCR to target its outreach and technical assistance to identified problems and to offer tools to the industry for self-evaluation and prevention. Organizations should continue to monitor the OCR website for future announcements on the program."

In 2012, OCR conducted a pilot HIPAA audit program for 115 covered entities that was carried out by a contractor, the consulting firm KPMG. It also issued an audit protocol offering a detailed breakdown of what was reviewed. OCR is revising the protocol to reflect changes brought by the HIPAA Omnibus Rule.

Rules In the Works

In addition to the pending audits, other HIPAA-related activities under way at OCR for 2015 include:

  • A final version of a proposed rule HHS issued last January to permit certain covered entities, including state agencies, to disclose to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System the identities of persons prohibited by federal law from possessing or receiving a firearm for reasons related to mental health;
  • An advanced notice of proposed rulemaking related to a HITECH Act mandate for HHS to develop a methodology to distribute a percentage of monetary settlements and penalties collected by OCR to individuals affected by breaches and other HIPAA violations;
  • A possible request for additional public input on OCR's proposed accounting of disclosures rule making. Samuels says OCR is still evaluating the comments it received on the proposed accounting of disclosures rule it issued in 2011, as well as recommendations from the HIT Policy Committee about refining the rule.

In a statement provided to Information Security Media Group, Samuels noted, "The [accounting of disclosures] rulemaking is still listed as a long-term action on our last published regulatory agenda. We are exploring ways to further solicit public input on this important issue."

OCR in May 2011 issued a notice of proposed rulemaking for updating accounting of disclosures requirements under HIPAA. The proposal generated hundreds of complaints from healthcare providers and others. Many of the complaints were aimed at a controversial "access report" provision. As proposed, the access report would need to contain the date and time of access to electronic records, the name of the person or entity accessing protected health information, and a description of the information and user action, such as whether information was created, modified or deleted. The proposal would also provide patients with the right for an accounting of disclosures of electronic PHI made up to three years prior to the request.

Other Enforcement Activities

OCR also has a number of other enforcement activities planned for 2015, Samuels said in the Jan. 13 briefing.

"We will continue to identify and bring to resolution high impact cases that send strong enforcement messages to the industry about compliance," she said. "These types of cases can include the lack of a comprehensive risk analysis and risk management practices, ignoring identified threats and hazards to systems containing electronic protected health information, and insufficient policies and procedures, and training of workforce members."

OCR also expects to provide policy clarification for a variety of topics, including cloud computing and the "minimum necessary" rule, which HHS says is based on the premise that protected health information should only be used or disclosed if it is necessary to satisfy a particular purpose or carry out a function.

"We will also continue dialogues with our stakeholders about issues on which they would like additional interpretation," Samuels says.


more...
No comment yet.